by Matt Cook (2014)
What an interesting book. I’m enthusiastic because I could identify personally with a lot of the histories and the commentary, whether
about upper middle-class queers in early 20th century London, or
mid- and end-of-century social radicals. When I say “identify,” what I mean is
that the actions, values and attitudes of the gay men that Matt Cook describes have
parallels with mine. This is astonishing considering range of times, classes
and demography the book covers. But because it seems so close to my reality, I think
that it’s an accurate picture and worth dwelling on.
This is an academic review that uses a range of case studies
to support the author’s observations about queer male life in 20th
century London. Matt Cook’s observations are, in my experience, sound and
thoughtful, but it’s the pictures of queer homes and households that are
particularly interesting.
Cook starts with the elite home of two late
Victorian/Edwardian men who turned their home into a place of unique taste and
refinement, a demonstration, as Cook says, of their self-perceived
sophistication and superiority. Their home is a tangible expression of their
distinctness from the common taste while also normalizing their queerness. This
is something that my partner and I reflect in our own home decorating choices,
though unconsciously until reading this book. But yes, we strive for a
demonstration of artistic good taste both as a statement of our superiority and
normalcy. Until Cook put it into words, I had not considered that principle,
but now it’s hard to deny it.
Cook’s observations about birth families and chosen families
are equally telling, although like most gay men I’m much more aware of this in
my life. The men in Cook’s case studies negotiate (in his academic language)
complex relations with family members and others, sometimes bringing them
closer, sometimes less close, but never severing relations entirely. It’s almost
comical to think of the most radical and outrageous men of the latter part of
the 20th century, like Joe Orton or Derek Jarman, going back to the parents’
home for the holidays, and reverting to their old family names and roles. Again,
this is something that I and many other gay men can understand. While we want
to create our own type of family and relationships, there is a state that
shifts between comfort and discomfort when we enter the family home. Equally
important is negotiating relationships with friends, both gay and not, changing
over time as a form of chosen family, who may or may not be sexually involved,
but may be part of an emotional and physical support network.
Fascinating to me, although not so much part of my direct
experience, is the shift from “bedsitterland” to the queer squats and GLF. While
both are specific to particular times and places in London, there are still
elements that I feel I can relate to. Living in what used to be Vancouver’s
queer ghetto, the idea of a densely populated neighbourhood where a
marginalized population finds community in affordable, if substandard, housing
seems quite natural, even desirable. I lived here in a housekeeping room as a
student, and still love the sense of a shared village within a bigger city. We
don’t have squats, but friends have lived in co-op housing, and negotiated the
kind of personal space that Cook describes – although not as radical in their
personal politics as the queer squats and GLF houses. And like London, we are
losing our village to rising property costs. In all of this, we felt, and
sometimes articulated, the need for community, security and identity that Cook
draws out in his observations and analysis.
Cook draws on a wide range of cases to make his observations. Many of
them I was vaguely aware of, such as the GLF co-ops, and the lives of
high-profile queers like Orton and Jarman. But the personal detail of how they
lived their lives makes those stories much more real, and humanizes them by
showing points that are similar to my own life. This is a wonderful survey of
queer life, and makes me feel part of a larger queer community. Now I want to
read more of Cook’s research.
