By Anthony Doerr, 2014
Although this novel is well grounded in a detailed realism, it’s a bit too metaphysical for me.Many things about it are very good. The pictures of the
lives of two young people, one growing up under Nazi government in Germany and
the other living under Nazi occupation of France, are real and illuminating. I
get a picture of the paranoia and privation, and the compromises that people
make to survive under terrible conditions. In this way, it reminds me of the
conditions shown in Suite Française,
and gives an idea of what conditions might be like in Ukraine under Russian
attack. Werner’s impoverished life in the mining village, at the authoritarian and
cruel Nazi youth school and then in the army is vivid, and I can understand the
choices he makes. The scenes of the Russian soldiers when they occupy Berlin
and threaten Werner’s sister are horrific – although they fall into a common
stereotype of Russia with no attempt to get beyond it, unlike the picture of
the German occupiers in Suite Française.
Marie-Laure’s more protected middle-class life is less
harrowing, but still difficult. Even without being rich, she is protected in a
way that Werner is not, as class has its privileges even in wartimes. The
challenges of her blindness don’t compare with his poverty, and in some ways they
seems to make life easier for her as people go out of their way to help her. Her
blindness seems to me to parallel more with Werner’s indoctrination, which
allows him only a limited view of the reality around him. The novel gives a picture
of war that is empathetic and lyrical, even within the horrors of the situation.
In spite of the detail and realism, there are many details
that I didn’t buy into, which made it difficult for me to completely accept the
narrative. Marie-Laure, for example, is often shown seeing details that she
can’t see. Even accepting that blind people can be highly aware of their
environment, how can she know that a spider spins a new web over the stove
every night? Or be aware of a reaction in someone’s face? She is a highly
intelligent and capable blind person, which is great, but she can’t know some
things that she cannot see. And Werner’s philosophical ruminations about the
excesses of the Vienna Opera seem equally out of place for someone with his
background. As these details accumulate, they start to seem contrived and make
the story feel artificial.
So the metaphysical elements to me feel just as contrived
and artificial. Werner and Marie-Laure are initially linked through the almost
miraculous connections of the radio broadcasts. When they ultimately come
together, I could perhaps see a link through Werner’s fascination with radio
and Marie-Laure’s connection with her uncle, if it were not for the
artificiality that I felt earlier. All the metaphysical language that Doerr
uses to describe the scenes just draws attention to the contrived nature of the
story. I can’t help comparing this with the metaphysical links that connect the
lead characters in Doctor Zhivago, which are so understated, but real,
that they make the novel a compelling classic that I look forward to re-reading.
The fateful story of the Sea of Flames gem foreshadows the
mysterious connections across time and space. The electromagnetic radio waves
connect everyone through modern technologies (magnified these days with internet
communications), in a contemporary science-like way that is too metaphysical to
be actual science. The theme of connectedness helps to make the characters feel
better in tragic circumstances. They overcome the absence of those they love,
and perhaps believe in something that isn’t war. This is something, but it doesn’t
offer meaning or respite from the brutality of war.