Karim Alrawi, 2015
Set in the so-called Arab Spring democratic revolution of Egypt in
2011, this is a rich book, full of allusions, metaphors and varied points of
view. It’s also absorbing to read, suspenseful, mysterious, descriptive and
peopled with interesting characters. It centres mainly around Tarek, a former
political prisoner who is drawn to the social changes, but who, to protect his
safety and his family, leaves Cairo for the remote mountain plateau of
southwestern Egypt (I think –the geography is deliberately vague). The story
also brings in his pregnant wife and her confused religious zealot brother; his
somewhat precocious child; a former political partner; and the villagers they
met when they lived in a prison camp in the same mountain plateau. With
shifting points of view, timeframes and locations, it covers a lot within a
very readable narrative, from modern urban Cairo to very traditional village
life, with variations on each of these.
It’s also rich with poetic metaphor that expands the story
further. It opens with a plague of birds that infests Cairo, which suggests
both a vast range of possibilities and liberties, but includes the raucous
noise they make, drowning out theatrical productions, and the bird droppings
that get on everything. Tarek is a modern storyteller who, perhaps ironically.
makes figures and gives puppet shows for a living. He inspires his daughter
with a variety of stories that seem ambiguous but delight her in her
interpretation. One central story of the beautiful stone roses formed of salt
crystals almost leads to his death when he treks into the desert to find her
one. A repeating theme of mathematical certainties becomes a coded love poem
when its formulae are given human variables. There is a twisted parallel in
this, too, when a rationalizing fundamentalist finds ways to interpret the
words of the Koran to justify his personal desires.
While Karim Alrawi is clearly supportive of the
revolutionary direction of the Egyptian crowds against the ruling corrupt
dictatorship, he does not suggest that there is an easy transition to a more
democratic future. In fact, one of his central metaphors is the babies that
refuse to be born until they (or the times) are ready. His Islamic believers
all seem to be ignorant or self-serving, but moving forward means fighting
against them, too. If there are any Islamic characters who are more
sympathetic, they seem to be mystics who don’t actively participate in the
movement, although they perhaps give others an element of hope or connectedness
to the future.
This novel provides a complex and intriguing picture of a
contemporary culture that is seldom seen beyond headlines. Although the Arab
Spring is just a background for the novel, the story illuminates it from
several points of view and gives an understanding of many different elements in
Egyptian society that are at work. The depth of traditionalism, political
conservatism, privilege and religion contrast with the strength of the forces for
change. While the novel has a hopeful ending, it’s also possible to see in the
forces depicted why the Egyptian revolution has become wrecked.
No comments:
Post a Comment