By Oliver Sacks
I thought that the life of Oliver Sacks would be interesting, but I did not know that it would take me into weightlifting culture, motorcycling, the gay scene of the 1960s, and the philosophy of consciousness. Perhaps I could have guessed the latter, as his books that I know of (but haven’t read) are about consciousness and perception. But the incidents of his life – as selected and highlighted here – show him as an impetuous, obsessive and deeply thoughtful personality – the sort of person you would enjoy spending an evening with if he were not also rather shy and withdrawn.
Fortunately,
though, like many shy people, when you get him going on his subject he can
ramble on endlessly with fascinating details. He does ramble more or less
chronologically through his life, stopping at various points to describe
anecdotes of his experiences. He jumps around a bit, and over some chunks of
his life, but the anecdotes he tells seem to be at key incidents that led to
insights about himself or about the psychology of the mind. For example, his
initial repressed homosexuality in London in 1959 contrasts with his jump into
the lively gay sexuality of San Francisco in the 1960s and ’70s. He then seems
to have become celibate until meeting his life partner Billy in 2008,
completely skipping over the AIDS health crisis of the 1980s and ’90s. This spotty
anecdotal approach makes this more of a selection of memoirs than an
autobiography, although it does reveal a lot about how his thinking develops
and how it affected his approach to psychology and neurology.
Sacks
describes himself as a storyteller, a trait he says he picked up from his
mother. Storytelling is the style he adopted for his professional writing, describing
case histories of his patients rather than abstracting their stories to symptoms
and outcomes. This in part may explain why his books have met resistance among
other neurologists but have also been so popular among general readers. In
seeing his patients as people with life stories, rather than as the abstractions
common in conventional medical writing, he understands them more deeply than
other researchers might. It appears that he takes his patients’ histories and
ponders them extensively as he attempts to describe them, sometimes taking
months to write each one. With this approach, it’s understandable that his
patients grow deeply attached to him and many become long-time friends. It’s
probably not possible to say that this is a better approach than the
conventional one, but certainly it seems invaluable to have some researchers taking
an in-depth holistic view while others take the focused examination.
Fascinatingly,
later in his life, Sacks comes to the conclusion that perception, experience
and consciousness are constructed phenomena, formed by each individual in a way
similar to the way that learning and memory are individually constructed. Paraphrasing
Gerald Edelman, he says “As we move about, our sense organs take samplings of
the world, and from these, maps are created in the brain. There then occurs
with experience a selective strengthening of those mappings that corresponds to
successful perceptions – successful in that they prove the most useful and
powerful for the building of ‘reality.’ ” This of course implies that each
individual builds a unique picture of reality and a unique consciousness,
although presumably with a coherence among other people with “successful”
mappings. This radical understanding comes late in Sacks’ life, so he does not
have time in this book to talk about its implications.
No comments:
Post a Comment